Google

WWW ISOU




Like ISOU? Make a Donation!


Connect
View David Anderson's profile on LinkedIn
Recent Entries
 
August 24, 2007
All these old farts....
JACKSON, Mississippi (AP) -- James Ford Seale, a reputed Ku Klux Klansman, was sentenced Friday to three life terms in prison for his role in the 1964 abduction and murder of two black teenagers in southwest Mississippi.

are finally being bought to justice.


obrady.jpg


Its a good thing...

Posted by David A at 02:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 47 Words
May 22, 2007
Illegal Immigration

This guy makes some good points...

Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that Congress is finally addressing the issue of illegal immigration.


Certain people are angry that the US might protect its own borders, might make it harder to sneak
into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely.

Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests. Let's say I break into your
house. Let's say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave.

But I say, "I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the laundry and swept the floors.
I've done all the things you don't like to do. I'm hard-working and honest
(except for when I broke into your house).

According to the protesters:
You are Required to let me stay in your house You are Required to add me to your family's
insurance plan You are Required to Educate my kids You are Required to Provide other benefits
to me & to my family (my husband will do all of your yard work because he is also hard-working
and honest, except for that breaking in part).

If you try to call the police or force me out, I will call my friends who will picket your house carrying
signs that proclaim my RIGHT to be there.

It's only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying to better myself.
I'm a hard-working and honest, person, except for well, you know, I did break into your house
And what a deal it is for me!!!

I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can
do about it without being accused of cold, [] uncaring, selfish, prejudiced, and bigoted behavior.

Oh yeah, I DEMAND that you to learn MY LANGUAGE!!! so you can communicate with me.

Why can't people see how ridiculous this is?! Only in America.

Posted by David A at 07:14 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 337 Words
April 24, 2007
It's all coming apart....

Pat Tillman's brother's testimony was devastating...


Pat Tillman's brother accused the military Tuesday of "intentional falsehoods" and "deliberate and careful misrepresentations" in portraying the football star's death in Afghanistan as the result of heroic engagement with the enemy instead of friendly fire.

"We believe this narrative was intended to deceive the family but more importantly the American public," Kevin Tillman told a hearing of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee. "Pat's death was clearly the result of fratricide," he said.

"Revealing that Pat's death was a fratricide would have been yet another political disaster in a month of political disasters ... so the truth needed to be suppressed," said Tillman, who was in a convoy behind his brother when the incident happened three years ago but didn't see it.

He said the Tillman family has sought for years to get at the truth about Pat Tillman's death.

"We have now concluded that our efforts are being actively thwarted by powers that are more interested in protecting a narrative than getting at the truth and seeing justice is served," he said.

Tillman was killed on April 22, 2004, after his Army Ranger comrades were ambushed in eastern Afghanistan. Rangers in a convoy trailing Tillman's group had just emerged from a canyon where they had been fired upon. They saw Tillman and mistakenly fired on him.

Committee chairman Rep. Henry Waxman (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., contended that the federal government invented "sensational details and stories" about the death of Pat Tillman and the rescue of Jessica Lynch from Iraq.

"The government violated its most basic responsibility," said Waxman.

Jessica Lynch is up now... And the Hollywood storty is being ripped apart... You know, Jessica deserves a medal, for being brave enough to cut through the propaganda and bullshit and to acknowledge the real heroes.

In the meantime, our young people continue to die in Iraq, and there is no end in sight.


Funny how this is the biggest story of the day, and the Right's biggest blog is ignoring it.

Posted by David A at 09:47 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0) | 342 Words
April 19, 2007
The Mind of the VT Psycho

This guy was planning this for a LONG time....

BLACKSBURG, Virginia (CNN) -- Virginia Tech students reacted with disgust, anger, shock and fear Thursday to the paranoid multimedia manifesto that student gunman Cho Seung-Hui mailed the morning of his Monday killing spree.

NBC News announced Wednesday night that it had received a package from Cho containing photos, 27 videos and an 1,800-word diatribe.

It appears the package was mailed after two people were killed at a dormitory early Monday and before Cho entered the university's Norris Hall and exacted the worst mass shooting by a lone gunman in U.S. history. (Watch Cho's menacing last messages Video)

Karan Grewal, who once shared a dorm suite with Cho, said one of the videos appears to have been filmed in one of the dorm's common areas.

"It's just a scary feeling that maybe he was sitting out there the entire year trying to figure out our schedules so he could make these videos," Grewal said. "It's really scary that he was out there while we were in our rooms possibly."

Junior Kristy Venning told The Associated Press that she "just got chills" when she first saw his photo on television.

"It shows he put so much thought into this, and I think it's sick," she told the AP.

It was frightening enough that the 26,000-pupil school fell victim to a gunman who mercilessly unloaded the magazines of his semiautomatic pistols into students and faculty members, killing 30 at Norris before killing himself.

But for some students, Cho's manifesto made the tragedy even more terrifying. (Watch what the name on the package -- Ax Ishmael -- could mean Video)

"It was absolutely terrible. For someone to purposely know what they were going to do to our school and the community, there's no words for it," said sophomore Britney Rockwell, holding back tears.

The reaction of others was anger, not only at Cho for meticulously premeditating his rampage, but also at the media for airing his last recorded words and images.

Meredith Vieira, co-host of NBC's "Today" show, said some victims' relatives had canceled interviews with the network "because they were very upset with NBC for airing the images," the AP reported.

Student Robert Bowman, managing editor of the school newspaper, told CNN that he was conflicted: As a journalist, he wants to disseminate information; but as a student, he'd prefer that the tapes weren't released.

And you know what? It is pretty scary that we live in a society where people like Cho can live in a silent simmer, plotting to murder scores of people, and no one seems to notice that there is something wrong. This is sad...

Posted by David A at 12:26 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 448 Words
April 16, 2007
31 Dead at Virginia Tech
(CNN) -- A lone gunman is dead after police said he killed at least 21 31 people Monday during shootings in a dorm and a classroom at Virginia Tech -- the deadliest school attack in U.S. history.

Government officials told The Associated Press that the death toll had grown to 31, including the gunman. CNN is working to confirm the report.

"Some victims were shot in a classroom," university police Chief Wendell Flinchum said during a news conference in Blacksburg.

This is still sorting itself out, so I certainly dont know any more than anyone else following this story. What a tragedy! This is my home state, and Blackburg is not far from my own hometown... It is very sad that our young people can not feel safe in school anymore...

Posted by David A at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 131 Words
January 23, 2007
No matter how it ends up...

The Bush administration is one of the most corrupt and morally bankrupt administrations in U.S. history. How some people continue to get up and defend these dirtbags day after day, is beyond revolting.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Top White House officials tried to blame vice presidential aide "Scooter" Libby for the 2003 leak of a CIA operative's identity to protect President Bush's political strategist, Karl Rove, Libby's defense attorney said Tuesday as his perjury trial began. (emphasis mine)

I. Lewis Libby is accused of lying to FBI agents, who began investigating after syndicated columnist Robert Novak revealed that a chief Bush administration critic, Joseph Wilson, was married to CIA operative Valerie Plame.

When the leak investigation was launched, White House officials cleared Rove of wrongdoing but stopped short of doing so for Libby. Libby, who had been asked to counter Wilson's criticisms, felt betrayed and sought out his boss, Vice President Dick Cheney, Wells said. (Watch why jurists were asked about Vice President Cheney Video)

"They're trying to set me up. They want me to be the sacrificial lamb," attorney Theodore Wells said, recalling Libby's end of the conversation. "I will not be sacrificed so Karl Rove can be protected."

Rove was one of two sources for Novak's story. The other was then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. Nobody, including Rove and Armitage, has been charged with the leak. Libby is accused of lying to investigators and obstructing the probe into the leak.

Cheney's notes from that meeting underscore Libby's concern, Wells said.

"Not going to protect one staffer and sacrifice the guy that was asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder," the note said, according to Wells.

The description of the White House infighting was a rare glimpse into the secretive workings of Bush's inner circle. It also underscores how hectic and stressful the White House had become when the probe was launched.

By pointing the finger at Rove, whom he referred to as "the lifeblood of the Republican party," Wells sought to cast Libby as a scapegoat.

"He is an innocent man and he has been wrongly and unjustly and unfairly accused," Wells said.

To all my friends on the right who tried to say that Rove was vindicated... Shame on you, and shame on this administration for the web of lies that they have wove, since BEFORE taking office. But it's all coming home to roost. Even the Republicans are abandoning Bush on Iraq. And the Press, so long a tool for this administration, whipped into being so by YOU, are being forced to see the truth.

Let me make a prediction....

Bush will go down in History as the worst President in History, and YOU, all of you, will live with the shame of your shameless cheerleading for an administration that is responsible for heinous crimes... Your obsession with Bill Clinton's blow job seems pathetic in the face of this historical disaster...

Posted by David A at 05:54 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | 488 Words
January 18, 2007
Like I said....
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- A U.S. sheriff opened an investigation Wednesday into the death of a 28-year-old woman who died after taking part in a California radio contest in which contestants had to drink as much water as possible.

Sacramento station KDND-FM has fired 10 staff members over Friday's competition, called "Hold your wee for a Wii," in which about 20 people tried to out-drink each other without going to the toilet to win a Nintendo Wii games console.

Jennifer Strange, 28, a mother of three, died from suspected water intoxication after coming second. She was reported to have drunk about seven quarts of water in a bid to win the Wii for her children.

After the contest she called in sick at work and was found dead at her home about five hours later.

The people behind Jennifers death should be in jail. If nothing else besides they are too fucking stupid to be loose in the world.

Posted by David A at 05:12 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 161 Words
January 17, 2007
These people should go to Jail...
We're sure something dumber than this whole "drink until you die of water intoxication to win a Wii" thing was perpetrated back in the Tickle Me Elmo hysterical days of yore, but we can't really imagine what. The owners of KDND FM didn't seem to have a hard time figuring out what to do about this situation: they've fired 10 employees of the station, including the three hosts of "Morning Rave," which were directly involved in the contest that ended in Jennifer Lea Strange's death.


Engadget

Based on this, I think they should go to jail for criminal negligence.

Posted by David A at 02:36 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 100 Words
December 24, 2006
These people ought to be jailed!

baby-and-device-nt.jpg

I would not have believe this, if I did not see it with my own eyes. The people that this site are referring to, are sadist who should be imprisoned!

Posted by David A at 05:14 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 30 Words
December 22, 2006
Duke Rape Case - Update

This case needs to be dismissed, Nifong fired, and the so called "victim," prosecuted. I admit I believed that the young men from Duke raped the young woman. I believe at this time, that I was wrong, and I believe that continuing to prosecute these young men is a crime in and of itself!

Posted by David A at 01:30 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (1) | 54 Words
December 14, 2006
Duke Rape Case - Update
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) - DNA testing in the Duke lacrosse rape case found genetic material from several males in the accuser’s body and her underwear - but none from any team member, defense attorneys said in court papers Wednesday.

The papers were filed by attorneys for the three lacrosse players charged, Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans. They complained that the information about DNA from other men was not disclosed in a report prosecutors provided earlier this year to the defense.

The testing was conducted at a private laboratory for the prosecution.

This is strong evidence of innocence in a case in which the accuser denied engaging in any sexual activity in the days before the alleged assault, told police she last had consensual sexual intercourse a week before the assault, and claimed that her attackers did not use condoms and ejaculated,” the defense said.

I have always said that if these allegations turned out to be false, that I would admit I was wrong. It looks very much like I WAS wrong. At least all the evidence points to me being wrong. No I never pronounced anyone guilty. But I will freely admit that I thought they were. The DA may still have something up his sleeve, that proves guilt.

If he does, I believe it is time to put it on the table, or to admit that these boys have been wrongly accused. And if they were, the accused needs to face the full penalty allowed by law.

Posted by David A at 01:58 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 251 Words
December 12, 2006
A debate on TMV on Pinochet

Today's piece:

I must admit, Marc, I am extraordinarily disturbed by the growing chorus of apologia for brutal thug Augusto Pinochet. The argument seems to be twofold: 1) A left-wing dictator would have been worse, and 2) at least he helped spark the economy. Both, I feel, are being wielded far too casually to excuse one of the hemisphere's most notorious tyrants.

To the first, yes, Pinochet is likely better than Fidel Castro. Castro, for his part, is likely better than Adolph Hitler. The debate as to whether right-wing or left-wing dictators are "worse" is tiresome and, I feel, puts the desire to score partisan points ahead of what should be a bipartisan and universal norm of condemning all of history's murderous tyrants to the hell they belong. Moreover, I can't be too impressed by Pinochet voluntarily stepping down and "pav[ing] the way for liberal democrac[y]" after over a decade in office, given that he got there by overthrowing a democratically elected government in Salvador Allende. Allende may not have been ideal, but he was the elected leader (unlike Mr. Castro), and I think its an absurd attempt at counterfactual to assert that he, too, would have been a brutal thug. Democracy, at the very least, already existed in Chile. Pinochet replaced democracy with a particularly vicious tyranny.

To the second, I don't feel these sort of extrinsic issues can or should in any way be used to lament the loss of evil. I'm no fan of stagnated economic development, but I dislike thousands of "disappearances" and mass torture a whole lot more. Giving points to Pinochet for improving the economy is like giving props to Castro for increasing the literacy rate, or the British colonial government for making the trains run on time. When weighed against the type of incalculable evil waged by Pinochet against his populace, it is a flyspeck.

David is spot on...

Pinochet was a ruthless dictator who was responsible for the murder, rape and torture of thousands in his country. If you want to know what happened in Chile and elsewhere in Latin America during the battle against the spread of communism, read Empire's Workshop. Pinochet got an express ticket to Hell, where he will be tortured for all eternity by the screams of his victims. You know, the ones who were thrown out of airplanes flying over the Pacific Ocean, or of the women who watched their babies bludgeoned to death, before they were raped and had their throats slit. He might also hear the cries of the mothers of the dissapeared... I have no sympathy for the man. Nor do I celebrate the Shock Therapy that led to the so called economic miracle, that starved his population, and drove many into bankruptcy, before "curing them."

It's amazing to see Pinochet compared with Castro, as if it makes sense to compare two mass murders and to conclude that one was "less evil," than the other. Castro is an evil man, who is responsible for the death of thousands, and a brutally oppressive regime. When his time comes, he will share hell with Pinochet. It is the ultimate in hypocrisy to lessen the crimes of a murderer because he fits one's political ideology, or because he ultimately retired, or that the legally elected President he replaced MIGHT have been worse.... All ridiculous and immoral arguments, literally spitting on the graves of those who died at the hands of Mr. Pinochet, many guilty only of being "suspected," of being a communist, or being a family member of one, or... simply speaking out against the atrocities... Everyone eulogizing this monster should be forced to sit in a room with the survivors of his victims and listen to their stories of horror.

Interesting the hypocrisy of these people... If you are a murderous dictator that thumbs your nose at the US, you are bad. If you are a murderous dictator who works closely with the CIA to murder your own people, and commits acts of terrorism on U.S. soil, you are just slightly flawed.

I live in Central America. I personally know people who suffered under repressive dictatorships during the late 20th Century. Pinochet was one of many ruthless dictatorships or puppet governments sponsored by the U.S., and installed with CIA dirty tricks, and the wounds have not healed. Even today, in a country like Costa Rica, which was spared most of the worst of U.S. intervention, there is resentment. This resentment is most often today expressed in the form of opposition to the CAFTA agreement, which is seen by many intellectuals as an extension of traditional American Imperialism.

Pinochet was a murderer and a thief who stole tens of millions of dollars from his country's treasury during his rule. To remember him as anything less is immoral...

Posted by David A at 11:08 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 807 Words
November 30, 2006
This is scary!
Match.com may be in big trouble...

From my buddy Jay at Wizbang:

Online Dater is Raped

Like many contemporary first dates, this one began in cyberspace. Joseph A. Silva traveled from his East Providence home to Portsmouth, N.H., to meet a woman he had wooed on the popular online dating site match.com.

But he was hardly a gentleman, according to authorities.

Silva, 31, pleaded not guilty yesterday to a charge of aggravated felonious sexual assault. Prosecutors said that he drugged the woman's drink and raped her.

Silva was held yesterday in Rockingham County Jail after failing to post $25,000 cash bail. He is scheduled to appear on Dec. 8 in Portsmouth District Court for a probable cause hearing. The charge carries a minimum sentence of seven years imprisonment upon conviction.

Portsmouth police say they believe Silva may have victimized other women he met online. They released a photo of him and asked for anyone with information on his activities to come forward.

"Perhaps he used other online dating services," said Portsmouth Police Captain Janet Champlin. "We want to make sure there aren't other victims."

The alleged rape occurred in August, and the woman, whose name is being withheld by police, reported it to authorities within days. Police then spent months obtaining evidence in the case, including using legal means to obtain member information and e-mails from the dating site match.com, which has privacy policies protecting its members. Those policies resulted in the four-month lag before Silva's arrest.

Posted by David A at 11:35 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 242 Words
November 27, 2006
Nancy Grace is a DIS-Grace!

From Salon:

Grace gets sued: The family of Melinda Duckett, the mother of still-missing toddler Trenton Duckett who killed herself the day after taping an aggressively probing interview for Nancy Grace's "Headline News" show, is now suing both Grace and CNN for wrongful death. The suit claims the show misrepresented its intentions for the interview "in order to improve their ratings and for the prospective monetary gain of Defendant NANCY GRACE and Defendant CNN in malicious and contumacious disregard to inflicting severe emotional distress and damage" on both Duckett and her family. Grace's show aired the interview despite the news of Duckett's suicide -- you can watch the relevant exchange in a "Scarborough" clip on Video Dog. (The Smoking Gun, International Herald Tribune)

I have watched this woman play judge, jury and executioner for years.... Remember the Smart case, and Richard Ricci, who died with many people believing he had murdered Smart...

During the Smart case, when suspect Richard Ricci was arrested by police on the basis that he had a criminal record and had worked on the Smarts' home, Grace immediately and repeatedly proclaimed on CourtTV and CNN's Larry King that Ricci "was guilty", although there was little evidence to support this claim. She also suggested publically that Ricci's girlfriend was involved in the coverup of his alleged crime. Grace continued to malign Ricci, though he has since died[citation needed].

It was later revealed that Smart was kidnapped by Brian David Mitchell and Wanda Barzee, two individuals with whom Richard Ricci had no connection.

Grace is a disgrace to journalism and an embarrassment to CNN. She should be fired for this latest incident, and I hope that she spends the rest of her life pondering the lives she has destroyed in her overzealous quest for her own form of justice.

In this country there is something called due process... As a former prosecutor, you would think that Grace would understand this. Instead she sees it as her personal prerogative to decide who is guilty and who isn't. It's time to put a stop to it, and NOW!

Posted by David A at 08:57 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 355 Words
November 22, 2006
O.J.'s Book and Interview are canceled...

Well it's nice to know the Fox people can do something decent...

America has become a nation of such exerable bad taste that it was gratifying that media baron Rupert Murdoch, the king of scandal, has however belatedly pulled the plug on a book and TV interview with O.J. Simpson in which the man widely regarded as the killer was going to tell how he might have murdered his former wife and her friend.

By the time Murdoch acted, booksellers had returned to HarperCollins over 70,000 copies of Simpson’s stillborn "I Did It."
Said a HarperCollins exec:

"The accounts were treating the book as if it was pornography."

News of the book and interview prompted calls for boycotts and numerous TV stations said they would refuse to carry the program. And Denise Brown, Nicole's older sister, said that the publisher tried to silence the Brown and Goldman families with millions in hush money.

The listening to the American people bit... I'm still a skeptic. The people at FAUX news still haven't got it that the American people are just as outraged about the corruption of the Republicans and our current administration. And it might take another drubbing at the polls for the Republicans to convince them...

On the O. J. thing, well this is good news. The man needs to fade away into painful obscurity... He may have escaped earthly justice, but a higher judge awaits, and that court does not have racist cops or inept prosecutors to contend with...

Posted by David A at 11:24 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | 251 Words
November 18, 2006
The whole O.J. Simpson thing...


For years I have been in denial about O.J. Simpson. I watched the trial from beginning to end, and honestly, once the racism angle came into it, and I heard all the evidence, I did not buy that he murdered his wife and her friend. I grew up in Los Angeles, and over the years I had my own run ins with racist cops. I was once stopped at 4:30 in the morning, on my way to an early shift at Packard Bell Electronics. Despite having my PB Badge, all of my paperwork in order in my car, a valid drivers license and having committed no crime, other than "driving while black," at 4:30 in the morning, I was made to lay down in the street with a gun pointed at me, while wearing a suite... while the crackers ran a check on me. It was one of the most humiliating experiences of my life. Anyone who did not grow up dealing with that kind of racism in L.A., has a hard time wrapping their head around why many blacks felt as they did after the O.J. verdict.

But racism was not the only thing that led me to believe O.J. innocent... I just could not believe that in less than an hour, a person could practically decapitate two human beings, and then clean up what must have been a monstrous quantity of blood and then get on a flight to Chicago, without leaving more evidence. You slaughter two human beings and then leave behind "drops" of blood in your car... rather than blood everywhere. And the glove thing... Two damned convenient. A man commits a double murder, and is calm enough to fool everyone he came in contact with that night, and yet he tosses a glove behind his own house. No, it did not wash... And there are still lingering doubts in my mind.

Lastly, I knew O.J.... Casually, but I knew him. During the time I was at the University of Southern California, we recruited a number of athletes for my fraternity, among them was Marcus Allen. Marcus never joined the fraternity and was not a particularly close friend, but I had several opportunities to hang with him, and on a couple such occasions, I had the opportunity to meet O.J.. Now it is probably less than reasonable to assume that hanging with a guy for a couple hours, qualifies one to judge them. But I liked O.J.. He was a cool guy, and a Trojan, and he always took time to talk to us. He never seemed to be stuck on stardom, and I admired him.

It was for those reasons and others that I never bought the O.J. as a murderer thing. But the recent news about the new book... Well, it has convinced me to rethink my position. Joe Gandelman has done a good job covering the story of the book and the interview on Fox, so I wont rehash that. He points to a great post today, from one of the people who covered the trial. It is a compelling read, so please check it out.

The whole thing makes me sad. For many years O.J. Simpson has been a hero, then he became a martyred hero... Now, I don't know... He is just another fallen hero, in a world where we don't have nearly enough heroes.

Posted by David A at 01:51 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0) | 567 Words
November 16, 2006
He should have been shot!
FORT CAMPBELL, Ky. - A soldier was sentenced Thursday to 90 years in prison with the possibility of parole for conspiring to rape a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and kill her and her family.

Spc. James P. Barker, one of four Fort Campbell soldiers accused in the March 12 rape and killings, pleaded guilty Wednesday and agreed to testify against the others to avoid the death penalty.

"This court sentences you to be confined for the length of your natural life, with the eligibility of parole," said Lt. Col. Richard Anderson, the military judge presiding over the court-martial.

Under the plea agreement, Barker got a life sentence but will not serve more than 90 years in prison, Anderson said. He will be eligible for parole in 20 years.

Put up against a wall and shot. And yeah I support the troops, yada yada, And yeah I realize that 99% of them are doing/did and honorable job in Iraq, yada, fucking yada. Maybe it is just my perception, or maybe it is modern news reporting, or what the fuck ever, but this war has produced more disgusting filth, on both sides, than any I can remember since arriving on this big green ball 46 years ago.

The Redstaters love to talk about Rape Rooms, torture, murder, etc., I guess they just don't consider it to be as heinous when WE DO IT! As a father, as an American, hell on a lot of levels, this just disgusts me... On second thought, save the bullet and give him a space next to Saddam, and a hemp necktie to match!

Posted by David A at 06:05 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0) | 266 Words
UCLA Sucks!

All I can say is that I am glad I did not go to UCLA!

Read more at C&L

Posted by David A at 01:32 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 19 Words
October 03, 2006
Some people just don't get it...

This is not about what the Democrats knew:

Scandal: Right after Mark Foley was revealed to have had inappropriate e-mail conversations with a 16-year-old page, he resigned and checked into rehab. Now, what did Democrats know, and when did they know it?

It is about what the GOP leadership knew. DUH! The Dems have had almost no power for 6 years. Even if they did know, what were they going to do about Foley, except blow the whistle earlier. And if they had blown it 2 years ago, or five, as the GOP Leadership allegedly did, wouldn't they have still been accussed of politicizing this sickness.

No, trying to deflect the blame to alchoholism, gays, the media or the Democratic Party, is not likely to wash the stench off the GOP leadership that knew about and ignored what would end up putting most of us in jail for. The stench is so intense, that even the faithful are outraged, and well they should be.

Joe Gandelman, one of the best bloggers in the Progressive Blogsphere, writes what I consider to be one of the BEST pieces I have seen on the subject. I wont quote it, because to do so would do it an injustice. You simply MUST read it.

And this is....

No laughing matter...

Posted by David A at 01:47 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 220 Words
October 02, 2006
Can these people be any more disgusting???

Drudge... Kids egging pervert on.

Tony Snow... Just naughty emails!

Hassert.... Eh, I dont remember the specifics, it was probably given to me with some other stuff...

Oh well.... At least one conservative icon got it right.

You know we often ask on the left, "how low will they go," to protect their power. I think that question has been answered... I find Rick's way of doing it, particularly nauseating....

How much of a story will this black bag operation be? Since it was done partly in the cause of ridding the Congress of a pervert, one perhaps cannot condemn it completely. However, it does demonstrate a nauseating cynicism on the part of the left when it comes to electoral politics and makes the hypocritical charges of “cover-up” resonate all the more with those who are disgusted by such tactics.

Eh, what PART is it that you do condemn Rick? The fact that it was one of the family values hypocrits? And you are right, I can't read. It's not that I have a learning dissability, it's just that I have a hard time wading my way through the bullshit to find your point...

I do have to give props though to two ladies who I often dissagree with:

La Shawn and Michelle

Posted by David A at 06:37 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0) | 216 Words
October 01, 2006
More Family Values... GOP Style!

None of this stuff surprises me anymore...

WASHINGTON, Oct. 1. — Democrats expressed outrage today that Republican leaders had waited nearly a year to tell them about e-mails between Representative Mark Foley and a former teenage page, allowing the Florida Republican during that time to remain head of the Congressional caucus on children’s issues.

“This should be investigated objectively. I think the Democratic leadership should have been told 10 months ago,” Representative Jane Harman of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, said in a letter to the House Ethics Committee that it was “abhorrent” that House Republican leaders had known of Mr. Foley’s contacts with the page for a number of months “and that apparently no action was taken to protect these underage children,” Reuters reported. Ms. Pelosi said it was vital that the committee immediately question House Republican leaders under oath.



The fact that Bill Clinton was impeached for getting a hummer in the White House, from a consenting adult, and yet this kind of crap, can be hidden for months make that YEARS, by some of the same people who impeached him, is just sickening...

But so is the Conservative/Family Values set's reaction to it...

While the MSM echoes liberal talking points on the Mark Foley scandal, asking what did Republicans know and when did they know it, a curious detail was left out. The editors of the St. Petersburg Times in Florida reveal that the media has also knew about this story for quite some time, but did nothing about it.


So let me see if I got this right... The fact that Foley was having Gay Hotchat with teenages Pages, is all the Media's fault... Yep, that makes a lot of sense in the alternate universe that these people occupy. Well it's good to see the GOP Blog Machine is still staying, "on message," even when it is one this f***king stupid.

Thank God, there remains at least ONE Conservative Blogger who retains a shred of credibility...
Of course we can allways depend on Fox news to assist with spin control... Man this guy is a dirtbag. Meanwhile... GOP Leaders come clean, that they have known about this for months... Still wondering why they had not done anything about it.
WASHINGTON (AP) - GOP leaders admit their offices have known for months that a Florida Republican congressman was sending inappropriate e-mails to a boy who had worked as a page in the House of Representatives. The office of House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who earlier said he'd learned about the e-mails only last week, acknowledged that aides referred the matter to the authorities last fall. They said they were only told the messages were "over-friendly." Rep. Thomas Reynolds, who heads the House Republican election effort, said Saturday he told Hastert months ago about concerns that a fellow Republican lawmaker, Rep. Mark Foley, had sent inappropriate messages to a teenage boy. Reynolds, a Republican from New York, is defending himself from Democrats who say he did too little to protect the boy. Foley quit Congress on Friday after ABC News questioned him about the e-mails to a former congressional page and about sexually suggestive instant messages to other pages. "The improper communications between Congressman Mark Foley and former House Congressional pages is unacceptable and abhorrent. It is an obscene breach of trust," Hastert, R-Ill., Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Majority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said Saturday in a written statement.
Posted by David A at 06:23 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 598 Words
August 25, 2006
Prison should not be a playground...

But if you thought what happened in Iraq was an anomaly, you really need to see what happens in our own country.

Hat tip TMV.

Posted by David A at 02:49 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 27 Words
July 26, 2006
Let's see

Lets see, two Israeli soldiers kidnapped and 53 Israelis dead... The response, wipe a country off the freakin' map, and kill hundreds of civilians while blowing up UN Watching Post, seems like a "reasonable response," to me... Yeah right.

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Israeli warplanes and artillery pounded south Lebanon early on Thursday, hours after it suffered its heaviest losses in a 16-day-old assault on Hizbollah guerrillas that shows no signs of abating.

Israeli jets knocked down communications masts in the Amsheet area north of Beirut after attacking three trucks carrying medical and food supplies to the east, killing two drivers, security sources said. Israel accuses Lebanon's eastern neighbor Syria of supplying Hizbollah with weapons.

Other aircraft blasted targets in and around several villages and towns in the mainly Shi'ite Muslim south as artillery batteries opened up at Lebanon's side of the border.

Shi'ite Hizbollah guerrillas killed nine Israeli soldiers in house-to-house fighting in a frontier town and a nearby village on Wednesday, the same day diplomats in Rome failed to agree on calling for an immediate ceasefire.

An Israeli general said the onslaught, which has killed 433 Lebanese, mostly civilians, would continue "for several more weeks". The fighting began on July 12 when Hizbollah captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight in a cross-border raid.

I am all for Israel's right to defend itself, but this is not defense, this is punishment... Punishment of a whole country becuase that country does not have the resources to rid itself of terrorist. This is an outrage.

Posted by David A at 06:36 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 254 Words
July 19, 2006
Blog Stalkers

This person:

An unapproved comment has been posted on your blog In Search Of Utopia, for entry #2418 (The Dog House!). You need to approve this comment before it will appear on your site.

Approve this comment:

IP Address: 204.210.114.183
Name: Betty Friedan
Email Address: lsagaslgj@yahoo.com
URL:
Comments:

I have to totally disagree with you for making such strong claims on blogs about being pro-child molesting.

I think it's harmful to children, especially to children as young as those you lust after. I do think you're brave for posting your picture on all those blogs. It really shows that you believe in your child molesting.

But Wow, heated arguments for you child molesting on 8 different blogs!!! You got guts to be that bold of an advocate for child molesting.

Was asked politely not to keep posting the same nonesensical comments on my blog on a post about the Duke Rape case. She/He continued. I altered one of their comments to shut them up. Now it seems that they are stalking me, and posting comments on other blogs attributed to me, about child molesting. As a father and a Christian, I am appalled by this childish behaviour. But whatever... I will be reporting them to their ISP.

Posted by David A at 01:53 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | 207 Words
June 15, 2006
Looks like Rove won't be doing the "Perp Walk"

I was wrong, and Jay Tea was right. I am not going to whine about this, or make grand proclamations about justice not being served. I was wrong about Rove being charged and to maintain credibility, I need to acknowledge it. Touche.

Posted by David A at 02:22 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) | 43 Words
June 11, 2006
Duke Rape Case - Updated

I still have to wonder...

If the alleged victim in the Duke Rape Case was a promiscuous white Coed, and the accused were black players from the Football or Basketball team... Would conservatives be so eager to dismiss the charges as false? What happened to "lets have a trial?" If these boys are innocent, then we need to rely on the justice system to demonstrate it.

Instead, this case has been all about, "Ho's, and innocent boys having their lives ruined." If this girl lied, then she ought to be prosecuted. It's as simple as that. But the DA has decided to go ahead with prosecution, and a Grand Jury has found reason to proceed with one. All of these news stories about inconsistencies will mean nothing when the case goes to trial.

I for one am sick of this girl being dragged through the mud because of her profession or her past. What about the Gay bashing Lacrosse player. I never hear about that incident on Conservative blogs. If anything, that at least implies a propensity towards violence and discrimination on the part of the player. What does not seem to be in much dispute, is that racial slurs and insults were used during the party, a dehumanizing tactic often used by those inflicting violence on those who they see as, "lesser," than them.

I don't know what happened that night. I do know that there will likely be a trial, and we will ALL have a better idea at that time of how strong the evidence is. There is a possibility that the case may be full of holes, and eventually dismissed. If it is, great! But it seems to me that BOTH parties deserve their day in court.

Posted by David A at 02:44 PM | Comments (22) | TrackBack (0) | 291 Words
June 04, 2006
Who's to Blame in Haditha
The apparent cold-blooded killing last November of 24 Iraqi civilians by United States marines at Haditha will be hard to dispose of with another Washington damage control operation. The Iraqi government has made clear that it will not sit still for one, and neither should the American people. This affair cannot simply be dismissed as the spontaneous cruelty of a few bad men.

This is the nightmare that everyone worried about when the Iraq invasion took place. Critics of the war predicted that American troops would become an occupying force, unable to distinguish between innocent civilians and murderous insurgents, propelled down the same path that led the British to disaster in Northern Ireland and American troops to grief in Vietnam. The Bush administration understood the dangers too, but dismissed them out of its deep, unwarranted confidence that friendly Iraqis would quickly be able to take control of their own government and impose order on their own people.

Now that we have reached the one place we most wanted to avoid, it will not do to focus blame narrowly on the Marine unit suspected of carrying out these killings and ignore the administration officials, from President Bush on down, who made the chances of this sort of disaster so much greater by deliberately blurring the rules governing the conduct of American soldiers in the field. The inquiry also needs to critically examine the behavior of top commanders responsible for ensuring lawful and professional conduct and of midlevel officers who apparently covered up the Haditha incident for months until journalists' inquiries forced a more honest review.

So far, nothing in President Bush's repeated statements on the issue offers any real assurance that the White House and the Pentagon will not once again try to protect the most senior military and political ranks from proper accountability. This is the pattern that this administration has repeatedly followed in the past — in the torture scandal at Abu Ghraib, in the beating deaths of prisoners at Bagram air base in Afghanistan and in the serial abuses of justice and constitutional principle at Guantánamo Bay.

These damage control operations have done a great job of shielding the reputations of top military commanders and high-ranking Pentagon officials. But it has been at the expense of things that are far more precious: America's international reputation and the honor of the United States military. The overwhelming majority of American troops in Iraq are dedicated military professionals, doing their best to behave correctly under extraordinarily difficult circumstances. Their good name requires a serious inquiry, not another deflection of blame to the lowest-ranking troops on the scene.


New York Times

Now here's Allapundit's response:

They can't have it be an isolated incident, they can't allow for the possibility that it's limited to a few bad apples and some midlevel commanders because then the blame falls squarely on the guilty parties themselves. Which leaves the Times and its constituents double-bound: not only does it force them to acknowledge that American soldiers (volunteers, no less) do in fact have moral agency and therefore are partly responsible for the war the left hates so much, but it offers them no way to exploit the incident for political purposes. How can they call for a pullout if the plague of renegade soldiers going berserk from exhaustion isn't a plague? How can they blame Bush or Rumsfeld for creating a "climate of impunity" (in the Nation's words) if there's no climate of impunity? The actions of the other 99.9% of U.S. forces in Iraq should count as evidence on that point, no?

My ignorance of military culture prevents me from answering the following myself so I'll throw it open to milbloggers and our readers in the armed forces. Have you "gotten the message" that you should feel free to shoot Iraqi infants in the head if it pleases you to do so? Has the torture at Abu Ghraib created a "climate of impunity" in your mind that leads you to believe gunning down Arab civilians in cold blood is appropriate, and will result in no adverse consequences to yourself? Let me know in the comments or by e-mail and I'll print the responses, because I have a crazy hunch this "green light" argument is so much bullshit manufactured by Bush-haters as cover for their agenda.

Now I just have a couple of things to say about all this. Let's wait until the investigation is over, before we decide who is to blame.... But signs are pointing towards a cover-up. Bush loves to wear the Commander in Chief hat. For someone who avoided the dangers of Vietnam, playing GI Joe must be fun. I can wear military jackets, drop gloriously onto the deck of American Aircraft Carriers and make speeches to those who walk the walk.. But I can't take responsibility when things go bad.... What happened to "The Buck Stops Here?" Right Wingers like to make hay about the guilty being punished in the Abu Ghraib case, but no officers were charged in that case. None to my knowledge have been charged in any of the other cases. It has been enlisted men and women, who granted, carried out the attrocities, but for a President who suppossedly demands accountablity, it seems strange that no one in the upper chain of command has been charged. Sure there have been some shuffling of command structures, but no one has seriously been held accountable above the pay grade of Sargeant.

So my question to Allahpundit and others is, "WHY NOT." What kind of hypocrisy drives Right Wing thinking, that it's fine to bask in glory.... what little there has been, for the senior administrators of this war. But when it comes to accountability for these events, the leaders should get a pass.... This is something those on the Right need to seriously think about.

Posted by David A at 03:16 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | 976 Words
May 27, 2006
Jesus...

I have never read anything more brutal in my life... My God, if the investigation proves these accussations true, these men deserve death, and just as important, our Military leaders need to understand what caused our young men to break like this...

Then one of the Marines took charge and began shouting, said Fahmi, who was watching from his roof. Fahmi said he saw the Marine direct other Marines into the house closest to the blast, about 50 yards away.

It was the home of 76-year-old Abdul Hamid Hassan Ali. Although he had used a wheelchair since diabetes forced a leg amputation years ago, Ali was always one of the first on his block to go out every morning, scattering scraps for his chickens and hosing the dust of the arid western town from his driveway, neighbors said.

In the house with Ali and his 66-year-old wife, Khamisa Tuma Ali, were three of the middle-aged male members of their family, at least one daughter-in-law and four children -- 4-year-old Abdullah, 8-year-old Iman, 5-year-old Abdul Rahman and 2-month-old Asia.

Marines entered shooting, witnesses recalled. Most of the shots -- in Ali's house and two others -- were fired at such close range that they went through the bodies of the family members and plowed into walls or the floor, physicians at Haditha's hospital said.

A daughter-in-law, identified as Hibbah, escaped with Asia, survivors and neighbors said. Iman and Abdul Rahman were shot but survived. Four-year-old Abdullah, Ali and the rest died.

Ali took nine rounds in the chest and abdomen, leaving his intestines spilling out of the exit wounds in his back, according to his death certificate.

The Marines moved to the house next door, Fahmi said.

Inside were 43-year-old Khafif, 41-year-old Aeda Yasin Ahmed, an 8-year-old son, five young daughters and a 1-year-old girl staying with the family, according to death certificates and neighbors.

The Marines shot them at close range and hurled grenades into the kitchen and bathroom, survivors and neighbors said later. Khafif's pleas could be heard across the neighborhood. Four of the girls died screaming.

Only 13-year-old Safa Younis lived -- saved, she said, by her mother's blood spilling onto her, making her look dead when she fell, limp, in a faint.

Townspeople led a Washington Post reporter this week to the girl they identified as Safa. Wearing a ponytail and tracksuit, the girl said her mother died trying to gather the girls. The girl burst into tears after a few words. The older couple caring for her apologized and asked the reporter to leave.

I have read the numerous reports of the psychological strain on troops repeadedly deployed to Iraq. I have often wondered how I would react to that stress, and how our troops are able to deal with it every day. This case is going to have some serious impact, including political impact. Reports like the one quoted above will likely outrage and disgust the American people. There is no doubt that it will also inflame our enemies and help them to justify internally, "bringing it back to our civilian population." It's a mess, and one that is not going to go away for a while. And well it shouldn't. If innocents, especially women and children were killed in this fashion, the ramifications will be 100 times worse than Abu Gharib.

Hat tip Oliver

Posted by David A at 03:39 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 561 Words
May 25, 2006
Enron Justice

"We Believe That God...Is In Control And...He Does Work All Things For Good For Those Who Love The Lord"
Ken Lay

Yeah, you are right, that is why your ass is on the way to jail.

Posted by David A at 08:35 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | 36 Words
May 16, 2006
Some people just dont deserve God's Gifts...

I was watching one of my favorite flicks the other night. A Thin Line Between Love and Hate, Whitney Houston's idiot husband was in the movie and it made me think of her.

This was one of the most beautiful, talented women on God's Earth. She had the voice of an angel and the looks of a Super model.

Today I got an email from some friends of mine here in Costa Rica with some before and after pictures of Whitney. To say they were shocking is an understatement. The woman has truly descended into a self imposed hell.

I got to thinking about all the gifts God gave Whitney...

Her Beauty, grace, talent...

All, which she gave away in the name of LOVE. It is sad... Whitney Houston, Pop Diva is now a Bag Lady!

And I can't feel sorry for her. whitneyafter.jpg
Posted by David A at 08:52 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) | 144 Words
May 15, 2006
The Duke Rape Case updated
"Despite the fact there is no DNA evidence and the accuser's story has more holes in it than Patrick Kennedy's excuses for wrecking his Mustang, CBS radio news is reporting that the Durham DA is handing down a third indictment in the Duke rape case.

I can't WAIT for the civil suit these kids are going to bring."

Man I was going to wait until the trial, but now that Paul has weighed in, there is no need. We'll just wait for the civil suit, where these, "kids," can have a chance to win an autographed strippers thong!

Posted by David A at 01:32 PM | Comments (23) | TrackBack (0) | 99 Words
May 06, 2006
The whole Kennedy DUI thing...

Joe from the Moderate Voice has a great detailed analysis, and Capital Blue has the alleged inside scoop.

Logic seems to imply that Mr. Kennedy has a drinking problem. I am as big a fan of JFK as anyone, but Camelot is over, and the Kennedy's deserver no more respect than anyone else. I agree with Jay's comments here to that effect. And I think he should be in JAIL. But then I also think Limbaugh ought to be in jail. No one should be above the law, Not Bush, Not Kennedy, not illegal immigrants and not Rush. The only way we are ever going to get to a place where, "Justice for All," means Justice for All, is when we stop applying double standards based on celebrity, or family or position.

Posted by David A at 04:30 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 135 Words
April 30, 2006
SWEET!
Alan Ralsky, the well known "spam king" who proudly bragged about his spamming escapades to a newspaper reporter... and then got all upset when people who read the article started signing his home address up for junk mail, is apparently in trouble with the law again. Last fall, the FBI raided his house, and now Silicon Valley gossip blog, Valleywag, has an unconfirmed report from someone saying that Ralsky's now in jail. The report also notes that the spamming underworld is freaking out on the rumor that he's going to cough up some sort of plea bargain that involves ratting just about everyone out.

Oh, I SOOOOO hope this is true. These scumbags need to be sent up for a LONG time. I use Spamcop to report every spam I get, and yet every day I get the same 30-50 spams from the same Viagra, Pennystock and Real Estate Loan idiots.

Posted by David A at 01:55 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | 152 Words
April 28, 2006
The Outrageous Case of Andrea Clark
Let's call a spade a spade. When an insurance company pressures doctors to remove life support from a patient and those doctors take a meeting and decide that life support will be removed ... against the patient's wishes ... it is murder. When they pull that plug, they will be committing murder ... plain and simple.

This is not a family affair. This is not one side of a family wanting to keep their loved one on life support while the other contests that is not their wish. This is a woman who has made it clear that she does not want to die and wishes to remain on life support and Blue Cross Blue Shield doesn't want to foot the bill. Well, I am sorry, that is what Andrea Clark paid all those premiums for every month ... for them to foot the bill.

AMEN!

I have been away on business and had not heard of this case. Let me add my voice to the outrage.

Posted by David A at 04:51 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 167 Words
April 23, 2006
What Really happened at Duke?
May 1, 2006 issue - Racial tension, class conflict and allegations of sexual violence are perfect ingredients for a media circus. On eBay last week, you could buy T shirts decorated with a cartoonish "South Park" character, posing as a Duke lacrosse player, crudely taunting the prosecutor: MIKE NIFONG S---- A--. On talk radio, Rush Limbaugh was speculating whether the Rev. Al Sharpton would arrive on the scene to play the Tawana Brawley card after, as Limbaugh put it, "the lacrosse team supposedly, you know, raped some, uh, hos." (Limbaugh later apologized for a "terrible slip of the tongue.") On cable TV, Jon Stewart was making fun of Geraldo Rivera for gravely and fatuously intoning, "It is not always the nuns that get raped. Sometimes it's the strippers that get raped."

So begins an MSNBC post about the Duke Rape Case, and it's a must read, if for nothing else, but to understand the complexity... racial, political, social and otherwise.

I have said from the begining that I think the woman was raped at that party. I dont KNOW what happened, and I believe it is important that the case is tried and justice is done. If the charges are PROVEN false, I believe the young woman in question should do time. If proven true, I believe everyone who was at that party and had knowledge of what transpired should be tried as conspirators.

I have not played the "race card," in this issue, and will not. I KNOW race was part of the dynamic, but I think this is much more about power and priveledge, if it turns out the young woman was raped. If it does, I think the heart of the issue is that these guys felt that they were somehow better than the victim. She was after all, just a stripper, probably equal to a streetwalker in the eyes of the accussed. The fact that these two young women were dancing naked in front of a bunch of strangers, meant they were not entitled to any respect, in the eyes of the accussed.

I recently had the disgusting experience of seeing a video called, "Ghetto Gaggers," something a friend sent me and for some STUPID reason thought I would be amused by. I was not. The video consisted of about 40 minutes of an attractive, young, but obviously lower class black woman being subjected to degradation and humiliation, by two white dudes. The title will give you a good idea of what type. I sat through about five minutes of it, before asking my friend what kind of sick F**K he was and tossing his a$$ out.

I did a web search and found their site. (NO LINK), and was disgusted and even saddened that young women would go through what I saw portrayed there... even for money. The site must be a racist wet dream, as it is just a string of young black women being abused. On the other hand, there are other sites that do the same with white women and black dudes. I wonder if these guys had seen this kind of porn at some point? More than likely, the answer is yes.

Now before you jump to the conclussion that I blame porn for rapist, or am anti porn... I am not. What I am against is porn that advocates rape or encourages the fantasy of humiliation and degredation of of women (especially non consensual). You would be surprised at how many of these themes are popular in modern porno.

Posted by David A at 03:51 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) | 591 Words
April 17, 2006
Looks like the D.A. Must have something...

Two indictments handed down today against Duke Lacross players. I am so looking forward to seeing certain people eat their words.

Posted by David A at 07:36 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 21 Words
April 07, 2006
Another "Compassionate Conservative,"

weighs in on the Duke Rape Case:

Positive Outlook Friday means "let's give people the benefit of a doubt" Including the 27 year-old stripper who accused three members of the Duke lacrosse team of raping her: New information about the victim has been divulged, concerning charges arising from an incident that occurred several years ago. According to a 2002 police report, the woman, currently a 27-year-old student at North Carolina Central University, gave a taxi driver a lap dance at a Durham strip club. Subsequently, according to the report, she stole the man's car and led deputies on a high-speed chase that ended in Wake County. Apparently, the deputy thought the chase was over when the woman turned down a dead-end road near Brier Creek, but instead she tried to run over him, according to the police report. Additional information notes that her blood-alcohol level registered at more than twice the legal limit. In spite of that incident, her attorney at the time, Woody Vann, asserts that what happened then should not cause people to question her character now. He said she is a decen