Google

WWW ISOU




Like ISOU? Make a Donation!


Connect
View David Anderson's profile on LinkedIn
Categories
Recent Entries
 

« Today is my Birthday... | Main | Socialism and Monopolies will be the death of Costa Rica »

May 02, 2007
FUBAR

mission-accomplished.jpg

Published: May 01, 2007 10:25 AM ET NEW YORK Tuesday marked the fourth anniversary of President Bush’s jet landing on the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln and his speech declaring major fighting in Iraq over, all in front of a giant “Mission Accomplished” banner.

At the time, it was heralded by much of the mainstream media as a fitting moment of triumph. "He won the war," boomed MSNBC's Chris Matthews. "He was an effective commander. Everybody recognizes that, I believe, except a few critics."

Since then, it has become -- during four more years of death and war -- a symbol of American hubris and setbacks in Iraq. Today it is often lampooned as a tragic “photo op.” Rock singer Neil Young, in a song referencing the event, sings, "History is a cruel judge of overconfidence."

When Bush spoke, the U.S. had 150,000 troops in Iraq; the number now stands at 160,000 or more. American casualties at the time were 139 killed and 542 wounded. A year ago they stood at 2,400 killed and now it's 3,350 dead.

With that in mind, here are excerpts revealing how one newspaper, The New York Times, covered the event and aftermath four years ago. They include this nugget: "The Bush administration is planning to withdraw most United States combat forces from Iraq over the next several months and wants to shrink the American military presence to less than two divisions by the fall, senior allied officials said today."
*

By Elisabeth Bumiller

WASHINGTON, May 1 -- President Bush's made-for-television address tonight on the carrier Abraham Lincoln was a powerful, Reaganesque finale to a six-week war. But beneath the golden images of a president steaming home with his troops toward the California coast lay the cold political and military realities that drove Mr. Bush's advisers to create the moment.

The president declared an end to major combat operations, White House, Pentagon and State Department officials said, for three crucial reasons: to signify the shift of American soldiers from the role of conquerors to police, to open the way for aid from countries that refused to help militarily and -- above all -- to signal to voters that Mr. Bush is shifting his focus from Baghdad to concerns at home….

''This is the formalization that tells everybody we're not engaged in combat anymore, we're prepared for getting out,'' a senior administration official said….
*

From published transcript of President Bush's speech on aircraft carrier, May 1:

"The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror. We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda, and cut off a source of terrorist funding.

"And this much is certain: No terrorist network will gain weapons of mass destruction from the Iraqi regime, because that regime is no more.

"In these 19 months that changed the world, our actions have been focused, and deliberate, and proportionate to the offense. We have not forgotten the victims of September 11th -- the last phone calls, the cold murder of children, the searches in the rubble. With those attacks, the terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States. And war is what they got."

*
By Judith Miller

Believe it or not, I take no pleasure in Bush's failure. It is a failure that will impact all of us for years to come, but it is time, once and for all, for the last hard line Bush Supporters to get their heads out of the sand and understand that we are at best in a desperate situation, and at worst in a DISASTER that there is no way to recover from.

We may have just created a POST SOVIET Afghanistan, right in the middle of the Middle East....

This...

About says it all... Doesnt it?

Posted by David A at May 2, 2007 03:28 PM
Filed Under Iraq | 628 Words
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.grupo-utopia.com/blog/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3307

Comments

You know what I wish Bush had said on the Lincoln? Something like this:

" We have difficult work to do in Iraq. We're bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous. We're pursuing and finding leaders of the old regime, who will be held to account for their crimes. We've begun the search for hidden chemical and biological weapons and already know of hundreds of sites that will be investigated. We're helping to rebuild Iraq, where the dictator built palaces for himself, instead of hospitals and schools. And we will stand with the new leaders of Iraq as they establish a government of, by, and for the Iraqi people. The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done. Then we will leave, and we will leave behind a free Iraq."

Oh, my bad... he did say that.

J.

Posted by: Jay Tea [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2007 03:28 AM

Two questions my smart assed friend. How do you define, "major combat operations," when there are more people dying today that there were when he made that speech. Also, he have have said all of that, but then that was before Abu Gharib, Abu Gharib II, and the beheading circus had not even gotten started had it... Now screw what he said, and ask the average Iraqi how they feel about this wonderful new country of theirs. You know, the one where the power still does not work. The one where you can be murdered because your name identifies you as a member of a certain sect. The one where a simple trip to the market qualifies you for a t shirt that reads. "I went to the Baghdad Market today, and I survived." It's over dude. Go back and read Wizbang from the Glory days when you guys were getting TV anchormen fired and making fun of John Kerry in Bunny suits, because people like John Cole and the Commissar have come around to reality, while you guys are still trying to spin the unspinnable.

Posted by: David Scott Anderson [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2007 10:21 AM

OK, here are a few answers:

1) "Major combat operations" are large-scale, unit-on-unit conflicts. With the utter collapse of the Iraqi military, that pretty much ended those.

2) Abu Ghraib... you seem to forget some rather critical details. Details like: A) it was first reported by the military itself, not uncovered or revealed by a whistleblower; B) the incidents that garnered the most outrage all occurred in a single night; C) Lyndie England was there after sneaking in, in contravention of orders and regulations; D) the US military put the idiots responsible for the abuses in prison, and relieved of command the general who let it happen on her watch.

3) I never once made fun of Kerry in the bunny suit. I thought that was inappropriate; Kerry's wearing of that suit was fully in accordance with the circumstances and a sign of respect that he bowed to their requirements. Yeah, he looked a little funny, but I'd almost give a kidney to get that kind of tour, never mind putting on a silly suit that actually serves a valuable purpose.

4) The "beheading circus" is being perpetrated by the very people you want to grant victory to. I'd rather back the people putting them into their graves.

J.

Posted by: Jay Tea [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2007 03:59 PM

Like I said, SPIN THE UNSPINNABLE. Like the issue with that piece you wrote about Obama where you tried to make it look like he only "pretended to go to Catholic Church," you still have a problem admitting you are wrong.

1. Major Combat operations may be defined that way in the dictionary, but what our military faces today is a helluva lot more, "MAJOR," than a bunch of pussy Republican Guards running at the first sign of a Abrahms Tank.

2. Yeah and despite plenty of evidence that higher command, the CIA and Halliburton Interrogators were involved the only people to get shit canned were a bunch of dumb assed rednecks.

3. Funny, I don't recall you making that point at the time.

4. I want to grant victory? Eh, like you, I am not fighting in the war, so I don't understand how I could grant anything. I am simply stating the obvious. As I asked you the other day, HOW do you propose we win this. Your response, "We can't afford to lose this." I agree, but then again, I am not doing 15 month tours, losing my wife, or my regular job in the case of guardsmen, or getting fucked over (See Medical Care), by an administration that is BIG on flag waving and slogans, but not very supportive in any meaningful way, of the people doing the bleeding. Sort of like Michelle Malkin, and most of the rest of the Ranting Right, who will rant all night about the troops, but show no indignation at all when it comes to the indignities they suffer.

Eh, and I find it interesting that you just ignored my last point:


"ask the average Iraqi how they feel about this wonderful new country of theirs. You know, the one where the power still does not work. The one where you can be murdered because your name identifies you as a member of a certain sect. The one where a simple trip to the market qualifies you for a t shirt that reads. "I went to the Baghdad Market today, and I survived."

But I am not surprised that you ignored that one. Most of you guys do. I mean after all, this was REALLY never about the Iraqi's in the first place. Oh you said it was, you may have even wanted to believe it was. But it was not. How could it be when you are bombing the hell out of peoples neighborhoods, beating them down, and turning their entire country into a video game worse than DOOM. (At least in DOOM), there are cheat codes and you can go into God Mode.

This shit made a great background during the glory years of the first Bush Administration. Where everything was one big assed photo op, staged by Karl Rove, and the American Flag lapel pin became a fashion statement. That was back in the days where everyone who questioned the war, its reason, its winnability, was a left wing Moonbat, a loony, a conspiracy theorist, yada yada...

Today, no one wants to think about what really happened in Iraq. How it started off as a demonstration of the Awesome Military Might of the United States, and ended up being a symbol of our worst failures.. Worse than Vietnam... A symbol of how arrogance (Refer to Bush's picture on the Abraham Lincoln), stupidity (Refer to Wolfowitz, tens of billions of dollars LOST, or to Bush not realizing that there were two sects of Muslims...), and stubbornness (Refer to Rumfeld, Donald, and ask yourself how much his inflexibility and stupidity cost us in blood and treasure?) And cheerleading by a bunch of overzealous elitist, (See Right Wing Bloggers), who enabled and even encouraged the RAMBO fantasied of a bunch of Neo Cons, who mostly "had other priorities," during Vietnam, and who's children will never serve, but who march the children of others off to the latest IED proving grounds, with no hesitation at all...

Keep on spinning dude, perhaps it makes you sleep better at night. Or maybe... you even believe it. But I have to say, my own position is bolstered by the rational among you, (the aforementioned commissar and John Cole, among others), who have reached the same conclusions, that I came to long ago...

Posted by: David Scott Anderson [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 5, 2007 09:43 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?

Subscribe to this comment thread.


 
Finalist For the Third Straight Year!
2006finalist170bn0.gif

Second Place! - Latin America, Caribbean and South America!



2005 Weblog Awards Finalist!
wa_finalist150.jpg


2004 Weblog Awards Finalist!
200wde_2004WeblogAwds_Fnl1.jpg


Get the Best for your Ad Dollar


Get the Best Bang for your Buck!


advertise_liberally.gif


Navigation
scan00038fz.jpg
Search
Technorati search
Meta
Movable Type 3.2
Logo by Zencomix
Template by Rogue
Stats