Google

WWW ISOU




Like ISOU? Make a Donation!


Connect
View David Anderson's profile on LinkedIn
Categories
Recent Entries
 

« Patriotism and the Press | Main | Gimme a F#$king Break »

June 28, 2006
I guess this...

Just blows the hell out of Right Wing denials eh? But of course, Paul from Wizbang (One of the frequent denialist), knows more than these scientist. Or at least thinks he does.

WASHINGTON (AP) - The nation's top climate scientists are giving "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore's documentary on global warming, five stars for accuracy.

The former vice president's movie - replete with the prospect of a flooded New York City, an inundated Florida, more and nastier hurricanes, worsening droughts, retreating glaciers and disappearing ice sheets - mostly got the science right, said all 19 climate scientists who had seen the movie or read the book and answered questions from The Associated Press.

The AP contacted more than 100 top climate researchers by e-mail and phone for their opinion. Among those contacted were vocal skeptics of climate change theory. Most scientists had not seen the movie, which is in limited release, or read the book.

But those who have seen it had the same general impression: Gore conveyed the science correctly; the world is getting hotter and it is a manmade catastrophe-in-the-making caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

Others discussing:
Big Lizards, Firedoglake, Fausta's blog, Democrat Taylor Marsh …, Flopping Aces, The Anchoress, Hang Right Politics and Sister Toldjah

Posted by David A at June 28, 2006 08:46 PM
Filed Under Hmmmmm.... | 217 Words
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.grupo-utopia.com/blog/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2318

Comments

Wow. The AP says the right hand man to Al Gore in his ultra-alarmist, politically motivated, junk science movie gives his documentary five stars.

So 19 out of the 100 scientists they contacted even bothered to see such an important, ground breaking movie and they had the same "general impression" that Gore "mostly got the science right"?

I'm underwhelmed. I'm curious as to what part of the "science" he got wrong.

But does this mean I'm denying Global Warming exists? Nah. But to act like there is no debate among scientists is almost silly.

But hey- it sure is a great political tool.

Posted by: Marty at June 29, 2006 07:47 AM

Yeah it is, I think Paul has provent that with the many pieces he has written on it.

Posted by: David Scott Anderson [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 29, 2006 11:04 AM

I meant for Chicken Little and HillBillary.

Remember- I live in Minnesota where those Glaciers left over 12,000 Lakes for us to enjoy. Thank God for Global Warming.

Posted by: Marty at June 29, 2006 01:26 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?

Subscribe to this comment thread.


 
Finalist For the Third Straight Year!
2006finalist170bn0.gif

Second Place! - Latin America, Caribbean and South America!



2005 Weblog Awards Finalist!
wa_finalist150.jpg


2004 Weblog Awards Finalist!
200wde_2004WeblogAwds_Fnl1.jpg


Get the Best for your Ad Dollar


Get the Best Bang for your Buck!


advertise_liberally.gif


Navigation
scan00038fz.jpg
Search
Technorati search
Meta
Movable Type 3.2
Logo by Zencomix
Template by Rogue
Stats