Google

WWW ISOU




Like ISOU? Make a Donation!


Connect
View David Anderson's profile on LinkedIn
Categories
Recent Entries
 

« Looks like I just got another gig... | Main | You know I didn't agree with his politics at times... »

November 06, 2005
Torture

It does not work Rob... It's a plain and simple fact, it simply does not work... People who are tortured will say anything you want them to say to get it to stop. This is a well known fact in the intelligence community.

If torture were something that worked, I am sure most Americans would agree to its use, if it saved lives. There is absolutely no proof that it does. In fact, MOST evidence points to the contrary.

Posted by David A at November 6, 2005 06:32 PM
Filed Under Terrorism | 81 Words
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.grupo-utopia.com/blog/mt/mt-tb.cgi/986

Comments

Well, if you'd read the whole post you would have realized that I'm not supporting torture, but rather legislation that so loosely defines torture that it will paralyze the intelligence community.

I want interrogators to have certain techniques open to them without fear of repriasal from Senators with partisan axs to grind. Certain coercion techniques like loud music and temperature changes can be employed to great effect.

Posted by: Rob at November 6, 2005 08:14 PM

The question is where do you draw the line Rob, and there is no proof that that form of "torture," works any more effectively than any of the more extreme methods. I just doesn't work.

Posted by: David Anderson at November 6, 2005 10:09 PM

Police routinely coercion tactics to great effect with suspects and prisoners. Making rooms uncomfortably warm or cold, startling subjects with sudden loud noises. Granted, terror interrogators take it a step farther with the sleep deprivation and continuous loud music, but I still don't think you can consider those measures "torture" and interrogation experts are convinced that they work.

That's enough for me.

As for where we draw the line, that's a tough issue. If we're going to draw a line (and I'm not neccessarily against it), I don't want it to be as lossely defined as McCain is proposing.

Posted by: Rob at November 6, 2005 10:18 PM

Well I trust someone like McCain who actually has been through combat and torture to define it better than the people making the decisions right now. So I guess we will have to agree to dissagree.

Posted by: David Anderson at November 6, 2005 10:28 PM

Fair enough, though I wonder how far McCain has thought this through. I mean, I agree with him that torture doesn't do us much good, I just don't like how he's going about stopping it.

Posted by: Rob at November 6, 2005 10:30 PM

I dont think he has much choice. The administration is not making discussing the issue very easy or transparent.

Posted by: David Anderson at November 6, 2005 10:33 PM

Well, I don't think the Bush administration controls debate on the floor of the Senate, but their point in opposing McCain's legislation is a good one.

Posted by: Rob at November 6, 2005 10:49 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?

Subscribe to this comment thread.


 
Finalist For the Third Straight Year!
2006finalist170bn0.gif

Second Place! - Latin America, Caribbean and South America!



2005 Weblog Awards Finalist!
wa_finalist150.jpg


2004 Weblog Awards Finalist!
200wde_2004WeblogAwds_Fnl1.jpg


Get the Best for your Ad Dollar


Get the Best Bang for your Buck!


advertise_liberally.gif


Navigation
scan00038fz.jpg
Search
Technorati search
Meta
Movable Type 3.2
Logo by Zencomix
Template by Rogue
Stats