|
Connect
Categories
Recent Entries
|
« Subterranean Halliburton Blues | Main | You know what I find funny? » September 14, 2005
The Dred Scott Smoke & Mirrors Show
The trick to reading the news is knowing the little code words that conservatives use.
Not even John Roberts' strongest backers are trying to portray him as a staunch civil rights advocate. Roberts successfully argued against an assembly line worker who had developed severe bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome and tendinitis. Roberts also wrote, "... "whether encouraging homemakers to become lawyers contributes to the common good." This is not a man who spends time worrying about issues of equality. The reason Roberts mentioned slavery being overturned is the Dred Scott case. President Bush mentioned Dred Scott during the 2004 presidential debates. The President didn't seem to be worried about civil rights when he proposed a constitutional amendment against gay marriage. Dred Scott has been a conservative code word for abortion. See this Google search for yourself. The problem is when conservatives say what's really on their mind the American public rejects their ideology. If conservatives really feel so strongly about Dred Scott then they should do more for civil rights. Abortion and slavery are not one and the same. Conservatives that mention Dred Scott don't mention that convert racism of the John Birch Society. The conservative bible, the National Review published the editorial Why the South Must Prevail.
Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush have long ties to Bob Jones University. The school has practiced various forms of racial segregation over the years. I wonder how Dred Scott would feel about that. (Crossposted at Last Day of My Life) Posted by Michael Hussey at September 14, 2005 08:59 PM
Filed Under Guest Bloggers | 542 Words Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: Comments
Uh... Michael? "whether encouraging homemakers to become lawyers contributes to the common good." If you had watched the hearings when Senator Feinstein asked about that statement, you would know that it wasn't a statement about equal rights. It was a joke about too many lawyers-not whether housewives should become lawyers. Feinstein immediately dropped the subject on that particular statement. (Talk about out of context.) An National Review from 1957? Yeah- I agree they were asses IN 1957 for writing that and for much of what they wrote into the 70's. Many prominent Ppoliticians of today (including Democrats) said and wrote some stupid things like that back then too. But, talk about smoke and mirrors... Roberts my have some problems, but those were not very good examples. Posted by: Marty at September 15, 2005 09:22 AM Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |
2005 Weblog Awards Finalist!
2004 Weblog Awards Finalist!
![]() Get the Best for your Ad Dollar
Get the Best Bang for your Buck!
![]() Navigation
Search
Meta
Stats
|