Google

WWW ISOU




Like ISOU? Make a Donation!


Connect
View David Anderson's profile on LinkedIn
Categories
Recent Entries
 

« Welcome Salon dot Com Readers - Updated | Main | Bush War Question of the Day »

August 22, 2005
The Violation of Cindy Sheehan...

From Frank Rich's NY Times Column:

Hat Tip Dan Gillmor.

CINDY SHEEHAN couldn't have picked a more apt date to begin the vigil that ambushed a president: Aug. 6 was the fourth anniversary of that fateful 2001 Crawford vacation day when George W. Bush responded to an intelligence briefing titled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States" by going fishing. On this Aug. 6 the president was no less determined to shrug off bad news. Though 14 marine reservists had been killed days earlier by a roadside bomb in Haditha, his national radio address that morning made no mention of Iraq. Once again Mr. Bush was in his bubble, ensuring that he wouldn't see Ms. Sheehan coming. So it goes with a president who hasn't foreseen any of the setbacks in the war he fabricated against an enemy who did not attack inside the United States in 2001.

When these setbacks happen in Iraq itself, the administration punts. But when they happen at home, there's a game plan. Once Ms. Sheehan could no longer be ignored, the Swift Boating began. Character assassination is the Karl Rove tactic of choice, eagerly mimicked by his media surrogates, whenever the White House is confronted by a critic who challenges it on matters of war. The Swift Boating is especially vicious if the critic has more battle scars than a president who connived to serve stateside and a vice president who had "other priorities" during Vietnam.

The most prominent smear victims have been Bush political opponents with heroic Vietnam resumes: John McCain, Max Cleland, John Kerry. But the list of past targets stretches from the former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke to Specialist Thomas Wilson, the grunt who publicly challenged Donald Rumsfeld about inadequately armored vehicles last December. The assault on the whistle-blower Joseph Wilson - the diplomat described by the first President Bush as "courageous" and "a true American hero" for confronting Saddam to save American hostages in 1991 - was so toxic it may yet send its perpetrators to jail.

True to form, the attack on Cindy Sheehan surfaced early on Fox News, where she was immediately labeled a "crackpot" by Fred Barnes. The right-wing blogosphere quickly spread tales of her divorce, her angry Republican in-laws, her supposed political flip-flops, her incendiary sloganeering and her association with known ticket-stub-carrying attendees of "Fahrenheit 9/11." Rush Limbaugh went so far as to declare that Ms. Sheehan's "story is nothing more than forged documents, there's nothing about it that's real."

But this time the Swift Boating failed, utterly, and that failure is yet another revealing historical marker in this summer's collapse of political support for the Iraq war.

As usual Rich pulls no punches...

Read it all. It demonstrates an all to clear pattern of abuse on the part of this Administration, abuse of power, abuse of the truth, abuse of the trust of the American Public. It also demonstrates further the sense of invulnerability that this administration feels. And rightfully so. They have successfully used the same tactic again and again and again...

But as Rich says:

When the Bush mob attacks critics like Ms. Sheehan, its highest priority is to change the subject. If we talk about Richard Clarke's character, then we stop talking about the administration's pre-9/11 inattentiveness to terrorism. If Thomas Wilson is trashed as an insubordinate plant of the "liberal media," we forget the Pentagon's abysmal failure to give our troops adequate armor (a failure that persists today, eight months after he spoke up). If we focus on Joseph Wilson's wife, we lose the big picture of how the administration twisted intelligence to gin up the threat of Saddam's nonexistent W.M.D.'s.

The hope this time was that we'd change the subject to Cindy Sheehan's "wacko" rhetoric and the opportunistic left-wing groups that have attached themselves to her like barnacles. That way we would forget about her dead son. But if much of the 24/7 media has taken the bait, much of the public has not.

this time the vast majority of the American Public is NOT buying it. The very principle of repeating something often enough until it becomes truth, has backfired. The American Public has been hearing about Administration lies and manipulation for years now, and the idea is finaly starting to sink in...

The majority of Americans feel compassion for Cindy Sheehan. While her protractors are vocal, the majority see her as a Mother grieving over the loss of a son, who is entitled to her moment with the President. His fundraising, vacationing and grandstanding with Lance Armstrong have come across as callous and heartless, at the very moment when he needs to be explaining some things not only to Sheehan, but to the whole nation. Bush ran the first time as a Straight Talk candidate. Those of us who watched the campaign from the Left, never bought this in the first place, but a lot of people did. His failure to provide Americans with a straight answer on the debacle in Iraq has eroded American confidence in him, and his administration. It does not help his case when his Generals are saying one thing, His SecDef another and Vice President something entirely different altogether.

Recent poll numbers more than anything, demonstrate a lack of confidence on the part of the American Public in ANYTHING having to do with Iraq, and rightfully so...

The attacks on Sheehan have only made the matter worse. I predict that Bush will eventually meet with Sheehan, calls to do so from within his own party have made this a nearly forgone conclusion. The delays at this point are more than likely based on Karl Rove trying to determine the best way to spin a lose/lose situation for Bush.

Posted by David A at August 22, 2005 12:46 AM
Filed Under Cindy Sheehan, Iraq, Plame Leak, Plamegate, Politics, War on Terror | 959 Words
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.grupo-utopia.com/blog/mt/mt-tb.cgi/716

Comments

Crud, posted on the wrong thread. This should have gone here:

Of course, Rich is using the "repeat something often enough and people will start believing it" stunt with his mention of the Swifties. Not a single allegation of theirs was ever refuted, while Kerry had to repeatedly revise and correct and re-cast his Viet Nam experiences. For example, his "Christmas in Cambodia" crock.

Cindy Sheehan has suffered a great loss. But that does not grant her some great insights or any sort of authority. I wrote about this last week, at http://wizbangblog.com/archives/006747.php.

OK, I gotta write my own stuff now.

J.

Posted by: Jay Tea at August 22, 2005 06:54 PM

Hehe, you dont even believe that part about the Swifties yourself Jay. They were blown away every time they came face to face with anyone who was there when Kerry won his medals.

Posted by: David Anderson at August 22, 2005 08:37 PM

Care to cite sources, David? I never saw a single documented case of the 250+ Swifties being proven majorly wrong about anything. And Kerry's defenses were laughable, to say the least. To cite one example: "None of those officers served on the same boat with Kerry." No shit, Sherlock; those boats were crewed by one -- one -- officer, and a crew of enlisted. Kerry WAS the officer on his boat.

Kerry's famed video footage was almost entirely staged, with him returning to the scene of encounters and re-creating it. As proof, the fatigues he was shown wearing were Marine fatigues, not issued to Navy officers and considered improper for him to wear.

Need another? There is convincing evidence that one of Kerry's Purple Hearts was for a self-inflicted wound. It is alleged -- and backed up by circumstantial evidene -- that he fired a grenade off at too-close range, and was wounded by shrapnel.

Now, before you get all huffy, that does NOT mean he "shot himself to get out of duty." Many times soldiers are injured by their own fire or that of their comrades, and there is nothing dishonorable about that.

But by the rules of the Purple Heart, the wound must have been inflicted by an enemy. That's why Max Cleland, who lost three limbs in Viet Nam, didn't get one -- the grenade that nearly killed him was a buddy's that was dropped by accident.

Here's a quote from John Kerry's sworn testimony before Congress on June 6, 1971:

"We established an American presence in most cases by showing the flag and firing at sampans and villages along the banks. Those were our instructions, but they seemed so out of line that we finally began to go ashore, against our orders, and investigate the villages that were supposed to be our targets. We discovered we were butchering a lot of innocent people, and morale became so low among the officers on those 'swift boats' that we were called back to Saigon for special instructions from Gen. Abrams. He told us we were doing the right thing. He said our efforts would help win the war in the long run. That's when I realized I could never remain silent about the realities of the war in Vietnam."

BTW, Kerry has yet to sign his Form 180, authorizing the full release of his military records -- despite repeated promises to do so. He's given selected records to highly-trusted allies in the press, but that's it.

J.

Posted by: Jay Tea at August 22, 2005 09:23 PM

Dude, I am not going to rewrite the swift boat thing with you. First off, I dont have time. But there was plenty of debate disproving much of their comments.

Posted by: David Anderson at August 22, 2005 09:43 PM

Dude, rewriting wouldn't be necessary. Just cite a source or two.

And the best refutation of Rich's piece was by Cap'n Ed of Captain's Quarters, over at http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/005278.php. I fear my best efforts would at most duplicate his work, and more likely simply be a poor rehash.

J.

Posted by: Jay Tea at August 23, 2005 03:27 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?

Subscribe to this comment thread.


 
Finalist For the Third Straight Year!
2006finalist170bn0.gif

Second Place! - Latin America, Caribbean and South America!



2005 Weblog Awards Finalist!
wa_finalist150.jpg


2004 Weblog Awards Finalist!
200wde_2004WeblogAwds_Fnl1.jpg


Get the Best for your Ad Dollar


Get the Best Bang for your Buck!


advertise_liberally.gif


Navigation
scan00038fz.jpg
Search
Technorati search
Meta
Movable Type 3.2
Logo by Zencomix
Template by Rogue
Stats