|
Connect
Categories
Recent Entries
|
« August 02, 2005
I am not sure what to make of the so called, "Air America Scandal"
When The Commissar gets passionate about something, it is usually "Something." When the story first showed up on Wizbang, I pretty much ignored it as Partisan. Likewise, these three: Captain Ed don't exactly inspire me to get all fired up with outrage over anything. From what I have read so far, it sounds like the former head of Air America got some sweet heart loans from a children's charity. All in all, it looks like somewhere around a million bucks was involved. The network has now changed hands and there is some dispute over whether the new owners will make good on the loans. To be honest, it is hard to tell where the political opportunism ends and reality begins, and considering the clear cut common sense thing to do, it is not worth me "researching". Whatever the situation, pay the goddamned money and move on! Whomever is responsible at the Charity for loaning the money should be fired. The bozo who took it is already gone from Air America, and this "scandal," only dilutes the message Air America is trying to get out. Posted by David A at August 2, 2005 06:37 PM
Filed Under Politics | 188 Words Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: Comments
David, Thanks for the props. As far as I know, AA still has the money. If/when they give it back, I'll be quiet. Anyway, my real beef was with Mahablog's "fake debunking." AS far as the total amout of dollars goes, the Governor of Connecticut was forced to resign because of a sweetheart deal with a contractor worth $25,000 (or was it $2,500). And I think he's in jail. Posted by: The Commissar at August 2, 2005 07:29 PM You are right. And I did not mean to imply that the money was insignificant. It is WAY significant. Like I said, they need to just pay the damned money. Posted by: David Anderson at August 2, 2005 07:35 PM Commissar: What is your beef with Maha's fake debunking? From what I recall, wasn't she just exposing the echo chamber lockstep nature of the right blogsphere? I see a couple of other things out there that make me question the veracity of the insinuations you are making about Air America. Especially when those insinuations involve something that took place in the previous calendar year. It seems to me that all parties agree that, if the alleged events took place, they were the wrong thing to do, and they should be punished. It also sounds to me like AAR has offered to reimburse the monies of anyone wanting to get their donation back. There are quite a few other alleged events that have taken place over the last few years that I would be slightly more interested in examining than the AAR "scandal". Should we not examine them just as carefully? Is this type of scrutiny and action, before guilt has been determined, to be the standard by which we investigate any of those other scandals? Or are you making some sort of case that the AAR "scandal" should be front and center on the agenda of all good citizens? I think that Maha's point was that the media skews news stories and uses part, but not all, of the truth to twist things so it supports the spin they want to put on the news. And that they cherry-pick news sources in order to reinforce their particular POV.* Your post, linked to here, does not seem to me to address that, but instead brings up a separate issue. Would you say that I am close to the mark on my impressions, and, if so, would you care to address the (IMHO) valid points that I claim Maha has made? * - maybe the cherry-picking was a little of my own thoughts inspired by Maha's post. But I still think it is a valid part of this valid argument. Posted by: (: Tom :) David, The only way this manufactured scandal comes Karl Rove level close to 'diluting' Air America's message, is to ignore the former AA exec to describe the defendant in question! Despite these Right bloggers best efforts to distract from the Bush administration scandals they'd rather not post about, they could not even get Fox or MSNBC to bite! Now, if only they could connect Howard Dean with the disappearance of some pretty White girl... Posted by: that colored fella at August 4, 2005 02:12 AM The problem with this story..as Maha so rightly lays out..is that the sourcing is basically a "guy". There's one guy named Hitchens who seems to be the source for this story. While the story may be true (or not)..it's a problem when there aren't at least two sources. That's basic journalistic ethics/integrity. AAR has gone out of it's way to make sure that anyone who believes themselves filched will have things made right for them. I see this as antithetical to what conservatives on radio do when they're called out.... Falafel, anyone? Posted by: carla at August 4, 2005 02:23 PM Anyone having a hard time with the ethics of Air America just is not paying attention to how the lefties do business. Capitalist invest, Socialist donate. Go right ahead and donate all your money, no problem with me, but when you steal non profit money from the disadvantaged, well that speaks tons for the righteousness of the Socialist pigs over at AA. What a bunch of blow hard hypocrites,,,jeesh! Posted by: Dennis Yeah, I shame isnt it. I wonder what Party Ken Lay belonged to, or Mr. Tyco, or Mr. MCI-Worldcom? Posted by: David Anderson at August 6, 2005 10:59 AM Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |
2005 Weblog Awards Finalist!
2004 Weblog Awards Finalist!
![]() Get the Best for your Ad Dollar
Get the Best Bang for your Buck!
![]() Navigation
Search
Meta
Stats
|