In Search Of Utopia: Did Judith Miller start Plamegate?

Like ISOU? Make a Donation!

Connect

Recent Entries

« Things that make you go hmmmm.... Karl Rove Edition | Main | Rumsfeld Quotes - This is Hillarious »

July 28, 2005

Did Judith Miller start Plamegate?

This is some devastating Stuff! Is a lot of it conjecture, yeah it is, but it is brilliant conjecture. Read the whole thing here.

Not everyone in the Times building is on the same page when it comes to Judy Miller. The official story the paper is sticking to is that Miller is a heroic martyr, sacrificing her freedom in the name of journalistic integrity.

But a very different scenario is being floated in the halls. Here it is: It's July 6, 2003, and Joe Wilson's now famous op-ed piece appears in the Times, raising the idea that the Bush administration has "manipulate[d]" and "twisted" intelligence "to exaggerate the Iraqi threat." Miller, who has been pushing this manipulated, twisted, and exaggerated intel in the Times for months, goes ballistic. Someone is using the pages of her own paper to call into question the justification for the war -- and, indirectly, much of her reporting. The idea that intelligence was being fixed goes to the heart of Miller's credibility. So she calls her friends in the intelligence community and asks, Who is this guy? She finds out he's married to a CIA agent. She then passes on the info about Mrs. Wilson to Scooter Libby (Newsday has identified
a meeting Miller had on July 8 in Washington with an "unnamed
government official"). Maybe Miller tells Rove too -- or Libby does.
The White House hatchet men turn around and tell Novak and Cooper. The
story gets out.

This is why Miller doesn't want to reveal her "source" at the White House -- because she was the source. Sure, she first got the info from someone else, and the odds are she wasn't the only one who clued in Libby and/or Rove (the State Dept. memo likely played a role too) but, in this scenario, Miller certainly wasn't an innocent writer caught up in the whirl of history. She had a starring role in it. This also explains why Miller never wrote a story about Plame, because her goal wasn't to write a story, but to get out the story that cast doubts on Wilson's motives. Which Novak did.

Hat tip Stephen, who just made Inside the Blogs on CNN!

Posted by David A at July 28, 2005 03:32 PM
Filed Under Plame Leak, Plamegate, Politics | 373 Words

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.grupo-utopia.com/blog/mt/mt-tb.cgi/585

Comments

Mentioned on "ItB?" I'll probably get my usual "Abbi-lanche," of zero incremental hits. Oh, well, it's nice bragging rights. What post? The photoshop of Jane Fonda?

Posted by: The Commissar at July 28, 2005 03:53 PM

No actually on the post referred to in this post. Well what sucks is they don't give URL's so you are right about the hits, but congrats anyway.

Posted by: David Anderson at July 28, 2005 04:04 PM

This is interesting stuff.

Assuming it's credible, the next question would be what the Times itself is thinking here. Sulzberger could easily be caught between a rock and a hard place: don't back here up, and look like a weasel for sure; or back her up, and hope you don't look like a weasel later.

Anyway great gossip as well as food for thought, thanks. Now if we can take on Tom Friedman for his awful writing, we might win back the NYT!

(I'm following the story off and on, more from a freedom-of-the-press angle than an OMFG-Rove-is-Evil one, so I'm not really up on the latest dirt. Found your post via technorati, BTW).

Posted by: Kevin Frost at July 28, 2005 07:05 PM